Establishment of cross-cradle hold technique combined with intensive breastfeeding counselling positively impacts the weight gain rate in early infancy.

A quasiexperimental field study was undertaken in 576 exclusively breastfed (EBF) infants from 0 to 14 weeks in Gujarat, India to assess the effect of the use of appropriate breastfeeding techniques on daily weight gain rate and on reducing the underweight rate in early infancy. The interventions were delivered through the existing health system and focused primarily on counselling pregnant women during antenatal and post-natal sessions for ensuring 'effective breastfeeding' by adoption of the technique of 'cross cradle hold', appropriate breast attachment, emptying of one breast before shifting to the other along with conducting regular monitoring of infant's weight. The intervention care group (ICG) of 300 EBF infants were compared with 276 EBF infants in the control standard care group (SCG). The findings revealed that median weight gain per day between 0 and 14 weeks was significantly higher (p = 0.000) in ICG (32.7 g) as compared with SCG (28.05 g). The median weight-for-age Z at 14 weeks of age was also significantly higher in ICG compared with SCG (p = 0.000). Underweight prevalence was three times lower in ICG (5.3%) compared with SCG (16.7%) at 14 weeks of age. Infants in the ICG were noted to be 2.65-fold more likely to achieve a weight gain of 30 g or more per day compared with infants in SCG. Nutrition interventions, therefore, must aim not only on mere promotion of EBF for up to 6 months but stress on ensuring EBF is 'effective' for optimum transfer of breastmilk through adoption of appropriate techniques, including cross-cradle hold, by mothers.

Spending to grow or growing to spend? Relationship between public health expenditure and income of Indian states.

While there are concerns about low public health expenditure in most developing countries, the evidence on the linkage between public health expenditure and income is limited. In countries such as India, where massive public health programmes have been implemented over a period that experienced high economic growth, the relationship between two is a question of interest. We examine the relationship between two at sub-national level, as decisions regarding health are prerogative of the state government. We use data on gross state domestic product and public health expenditure over 1981-2017. Using a robust version of Granger causality that produces reliable results even in presence of parameter instabilities, we find presence of non-linear and bi-directional relationship between the two variables. We report inter-state differences in the income elasticity of health expenditure. These differences can be traced to the differing institutional set up, partly rooted in the administrative decisions taken in colonial India.